Independent from funding
Projects cannot purchase an approval and funding outcomes do not alter the verification decision.
Trust needs a visible process
Verification that shows its working.
A verified label is only useful when both parties understand its scope. ImpactEco separates identity checks, evidence review and enhanced diligence so confidence can grow in stages.
What verification means
Credibility is not the same as a guarantee.
ImpactEco verification indicates that specified information and evidence have been reviewed at a defined level. It does not guarantee future performance, eliminate all risk or replace a funder’s own legal, financial and technical diligence.
Our role is to improve the quality, consistency and transparency of the information available before both parties invest time in a funding discussion.
Proportionate to risk
Evidence requirements scale with project maturity, funding size and the nature of the intervention.
Time-bound
Material information can expire or change. Profiles require review and may be suspended.
Transparent limitations
Each profile should show what was checked, when it was checked and what remains unverified.
Three levels
Confidence grows with evidence.
Projects progress in sequence. A higher level supplements rather than replaces the checks beneath it.
A project can be asked for changes at any stage.
Major inconsistencies trigger a pause or rejection.
Approved status may be reassessed when information changes.
Identity verified
Organization registration or stated legal status, official website or established online presence, contact domain and responsible team members.
Evidence reviewed
Project design, budget, delivery timeline, track record, references, impact logic and supporting documents.
Enhanced diligence
Interviews, reference confirmation, independent technical review, site or field checks where proportionate and available.
Review workflow
A project can move forward, step back or be paused.
Initial screening
We assess category fit, minimum completeness, official presence and obvious inconsistencies.
Document and claim review
Project facts are compared against supplied records, budgets, public information and references.
Clarification
The project responds to questions, missing information or corrections. Silence or unresolved contradictions can close the review.
Decision and visibility
Approved projects receive a defined status. Rejected or paused projects receive an outcome without being published.
Ongoing monitoring
Material changes, complaints, missed updates or new evidence may trigger reassessment, flags or suspension.
Start with clarity
Know the standard before you enter the process.
Project teams can begin with an initial submission. Funders can speak with ImpactEco about diligence depth and reporting expectations.